Page 2 of 2
The FDA must
also determine that notification alone is insufficient, and repair,
replacement, or refund is necessary and consider available alternatives,
including legal actions (seizures, injunctions, prosecutions), regulations
(e.g., banning or imposing restrictions on sale, distribution or use) and
recalls (under FDA's recall regulations).
The
procedures for repair, replacement, or refund are complex and could result
in multiple orders, regulatory hearings, and many delays if FDA and the
manufacturer, or other responsible person, are unable to agree on a plan
for addressing a risk. The FDA must consider available alternatives and
must determine that no more practical means are available under the
FD&C Act to eliminate the risk.
Records
and Reports
Section
519 of the FD&C Act authorizes the FDA to promulgate regulations
requiring manufacturers, importers, and distributors of devices to
maintain records and reports to assure that devices are not adulterated or
misbranded.
Under
Section 519, the FDA:
-
Shall not impose
requirements that are unduly burdensome to the manufacturer, importer,
or distributor;
-
Must state the reason
and purpose for procedures requesting reports or information;
-
Must state the reason
and purpose for submission of reports or information;
-
May not require that
the identity of any patient be disclosed; and
-
May not require a
manufacturer, importer, or distributor to maintain or submit reports
or information not in his/her possession.
Excluded
from these requirements are practitioners who prescribe or administer
devices solely in the course of their professional practice, manufacturers
or importers of devices used solely in research or teaching and other
persons exempt by regulation.
Restricted Devices
Section
520(e) of the FD&C Act gives the FDA the authority to restrict the
sale, distribution, or use of a device if there cannot otherwise be a
reasonable assurance of its safety and effectiveness. A restricted
device can only be sold on oral or written authorization by a licensed
practitioner or under conditions specified by regulation. The label of
a restricted device must bear the appropriate statements of the nature
of the restrictions, as required by regulation.
Quality System Regulation, Good Manufacturing
Practices
Section
520(f) of the FD&C Act authorizes the FDA to promulgate
regulations requiring the methods used in, and the facilities and
controls used for, the manufacturing, packing, storage, and
installation of a device to conform to current good manufacturing
practices (GMPs). The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (SMDA) amended
section 520(f) of the Act and gave the FDA authority to issue
regulations requiring pre-production design controls. This change in
the law was necessary because of the discovery that a significant
proportion of device recalls were the result of a faulty design. The
FDA revised its current good manufacturing practice requirements to
include pre-production design controls that device manufacturers must
follow when initially designing devices or when making subsequent
modifications to those designs. (See http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/qsr/contnt.html
) We will discuss these requirements in future columns in more
detail.
Premarket Notification
Requirements
Section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act requires a manufacturer who intends to market a medical
device to submit a premarket notification (a 510(k)) to the
Agency at least 90 days before introducing the device onto the market.
The FDA will review the information to determine whether the device is
substantially equivalent to a device legally marketed in the United
States. We will begin our discussion of these requirements in my
next column.
NOTE
TO READERS:
Please
understand that in order to make FDA regulations more
understandable, I do simplify some of the language and omit some
details. You must rely on the actual regulations-not any
of my columns to ensure you meet FDA requirements. |
As
always, I welcome your questions and comments.
Norman
F. Estrin, PhD, RAC
February 26, 2003
Previous Page
|
|
If you have
questions related to the contents of this column, please
write to Dr Norman Estrin at yourFDAconsultant@medisourceasia.com
and he will try to answer you. This column is for you
and we welcome your suggestions on how to improve it.
|
Dr. Norman Estrin
is a
recognized authority in the medical device and cosmetic
industries. He has had over 30 years of experience in
directing scientific and technical and regulatory programs
in these industries. He is Regulatory Affairs
Certified (RAC) by the Regulatory Affairs Professional
Society. Dr. Estrin is the founder of ESTRIN CONSULTING
GROUP, INC. (ECG). ECG offers cost-effective,
experienced consulting to medical device firms on FDA-
related issues. Its Services include preparing 510(k)
and other FDA submissions, regulatory strategy development
and acting as agent and official correspondent for non-U.S.
medical device companies.
|
For more information, contact him
at
yourFDAconsultant@medisourceasia.com
or visit his website: http://www.yourFDAconsultant.com
|
|
|